|
08 September 2005
he dispensed w/ the cheney question quick enough. i'd say it was a letdown if such a word was applicable. but, damn, did he build this thing up in the intro, giving the impression that this appointment has something to do w/ his running for president in '08. how dare he play on our fears like that?
but, instead of asking the question of bernard kerik, wouldn't it be great if he posed it to cheney himself, on live television? oh, sure, he'd be polished to hell, answering the question however he wanted. but wouldn't the opportunity itself be great? or, at least, good?
posted by fred [link] 3:23 AM
0 comments
-----
|
|